Leadership Makes You Strong!
When you are a leader you have to face a lot of difficulties but an other thing is that difficulties make you strong. When we face difficulties the next time we become confident and we perform better. Followers don't even get a chance. So it is correct that it is better to be a leader than a follower.
Being a leader means you are respected.
Being a middle school child, I have learned that if you are a follower you don't always receive the respect you deserve. Followers are most often ignored. While being a leader you are recognized more often, and get most of the credit for everything, weather it be school, work, a project or even doing the chores. Over all I believe being a leader is best.
Leader is a good post
Being a leader lets you have the control. If you are just a follower you don't get any control over the decisions unless the leader says you can. While when you are the leader, you can control all the big decisions. Leaders get to make their own choices, while followers have to do what the leader says. That is why it is better to be a Leader (such as I) instead of a follower.
Being a leader lets you have the control.
If you are just a follower you don't get any control over the decisions unless the leader says you can. While when you are the leader, you can control all the big decisions. Leaders get to make their own choices, while followers have to do what the leader says. That is why it is better to be a Leader (such as I) instead of a follower.
Being leader has benefits
We leaders experience responsibility giving us power and benefit. We can lead our team to be more efficient. WE can have people work for us and we can feel the power. A follower has lower status than a leader. If the follower does not want to be leader who will lead?
It is better to be a leader
To be a leader can give you a big challenge. When facing the challenge, you will try your best to handle the affairs as well as possible. In the process, you will constantly enhance yourself to adapt to different and complex long conditions. It also improve your total ability greatly.
It is possible to be a leader and a follower all at the same time. Haven't you heard of leading by example? By leading in the right direction, you encourage others to step up in leadership and as a whole, move others in the right direction.
I believe being a leader is better than being a follower.
It can also depend on the person. Some people are not suited for being a leader. However, being a leader lets you choose your own opinions and you're not risking following a corrupt, unintelligent, unethical leader or a leader that lacks common sense. Like I said before, it also may depend on the person. Someone can have great abilities as a leader and others may not.
It is better to be a leader than a follower, because sometimes you can't trust your given leader.
When choosing to lead or follow it is a great idea to sit down and scrutinize your leader's way of commanding. If your leader's principles are corrupt, then you would not want to continue to follow them. At this point, it is better to be a leader than a follower.
You Do What You Want
When you are a leader, you can control everything and give commands acording to your thinking to other followers. You do what you want and you are not dependent on anyone but instead, the followers cannot do without you. You will get most of the appreciations and congratulations for the project you do. Overall, I say that a leader is much better than to be a follower.
Essay #5: Leader-Follower Essay Leaders are to followers as binders are to paper. There are no leaders if there are no followers. Leadership does not exist if there is no one to lead. If there was no paper, there would be not use for binders, but without binders, paper is scattered and unorganized. What is a binder with no paper? Throughout Northouse’s Introduction to Leadership , he often speaks of followers as if they were somehow inferior to the leader. Northouse refers to followers as “subordinates,” a term that can be received as demeaning. When describing the authoritarian leadership style, Northouse states, “The creative and personal growth of subordinates may be hindered,” almost speaking as if followers are children and the leader is a parent (2012, p. 54). Northouse defines leadership as, “A process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal,” but then spends the majority of the text referring to followers as “subordinates,” and not emphasizing their importance (2012, p. 6).